The utility of established prognostic scores in COVID-19 hospital admissions: a multi-centre prospective evaluation of CURB-65, NEWS2, and qSOFA

This article has 4 evaluations Published on
Read the full article Related papers
This article on Sciety

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic is ongoing yet, due to the lack of a COVID-19 specific tool, clinicians must use pre-existing illness severity scores for initial prognostication. However, the validity of such scores in COVID-19 is unknown.

Methods

The North West Collaborative Organization for Respiratory Research (NW-CORR) performed a multi-centre prospective evaluation of adult patients admitted to hospital with confirmed COVID-19 during a two-week period in April 2020. Clinical variables measured as part of usual care at presentation to hospital were recorded, including the CURB-65, NEWS2, and qSOFA scores. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day mortality.

Results

Data were collected for 830 people with COVID-19 admitted across 7 hospitals. By 30 days, a total of 300 (36.1%) had died and 142 (17.1%) had been in ICU. All scores underestimated mortality compared to their original validation in non-COVID-19 populations, and overall prognostic performance was generally poor. Among the ‘low risk’ categories (CURB-65<2, NEWS2<5, qSOFA<2) 30-day mortality was 16.7%, 32.9% and 21.4%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression identified features of respiratory compromise rather than circulatory collapse as most relevant prognostic variables.

Conclusion

All existing prognostic scores evaluated here underestimated adverse outcomes and performed sub-optimally in the COVID-19 setting. New prognostic tools including a focus on features of respiratory compromise rather than circulatory collapse are needed. We provide a baseline set of variables which are relevant to COVID-19 outcomes and may be used as a basis for developing a bespoke COVID-19 prognostication tool.

Key Messages

  • What is the key question?

    Do well-established illness severity scores have prognostic value in COVID-19?

  • What is the bottom line?

    All scores appeared to underestimate mortality in COVID-19 and prognostic performance was generally poor, and importantly could not discriminate those patients at very low risk of death within 30 days.

  • Why read on?

    In this multi-centre prospective evaluation of CURB-65, NEWS2 and qSOFA we comprehensively evaluate score performance and also identify variables which may be of use in COVID-19 prognostication.

Related articles

Related articles are currently not available for this article.