Measuring Oxygen Access: lessons from health facility assessments in Nigeria

  1. Hamish R Graham
  2. Omotayo E Olojede
  3. Ayobami A Bakare
  4. Agnese Iuliano
  5. Oyaniyi Olatunde
  6. Adamu Isah
  7. Adams Osebi
  8. Tahlil Ahmed
  9. Rochelle Ann Burgess
  10. Eric D McCollum
  11. Tim Colbourn
  12. Carina King
  13. Obioma C Uchendu
  14. Adegoke G Falade
1 evaluations Published on
Read the full article Related papers
This article on Sciety

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted global oxygen system deficiencies and revealed gaps in how we understand and measure “oxygen access”. We present a case study on oxygen access from 58 health facilities in Lagos state, Nigeria. We found large differences in oxygen access between facilities (primary vs secondary, government vs private) and describe four key domains to consider when measuring oxygen access.

Use

8/58 (14%) of facilities had a functional pulse oximeter for detecting hypoxaemia (low blood oxygen level) and guiding oxygen care. Oximeters were typically located in outpatient clinics (12/27, 44%), paediatric ward (6/27, 22%), or operating theatre (4/27, 15%), not suitable for children, and infrequently used.

Availability

34/58 (59%) facilities had a functional source of oxygen available on the day of inspection, of which 31 (91%) facilities had it available in a single ward area, typically the operating theatre or maternity ward.

Cost

Oxygen was free to patients at primary health centres, when available, but expensive in hospitals and private facilities, with the median cost for 2 days oxygen 13000 ($36 USD) and 27500 ($77 USD) naira, respectively.

Patient access

No facilities were adequately equipped to meet minimum oxygen demands for patients. We were unable to determine the proportion of hypoxaemic patients who received oxygen therapy with available data.

We highlight the importance of a multi-faceted approach to measuring oxygen access that assesses access at the point-of-care, and ideally at the patient-level. We propose standard metrics to report oxygen access and describe how these can be integrated into routine health information systems and existing health facility assessment tools.

SUMMARY BOX

  • Oxygen access is poorly understood and the most commonly used metrics (e.g. presence of an oxygen source) do not correlate well with actual access to patients.

  • Pulse oximetry use is a critical indicator for the quality of oxygen services and may be a reasonable reflection of oxygen coverage to patients with hypoxaemia.

  • Oxygen, and pulse oximeter, availability must be assessed at the point-of-care in all major service delivery areas, as intra-facility oxygen distribution is highly inequitable.

  • Minimum functional requirements for oxygen sources must be assessed, as many oxygen concentrators and cylinders may be present without being in working order.

Related articles

Related articles are currently not available for this article.