The Effect of Pandemic Prevalence on the Reported Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

This article has 1 evaluations Published on
Read the full article Related papers
This article on Sciety

Abstract

Importance

The efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates reported in Phase 3 trials varies from ∼45% to ∼95%. It is important to explain the reasons for this heterogeneity.

Objective

To test the hypothesis that the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates falls with increasing prevalence of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Data Sources

ClinicalTrials.gov , WHO, McGill and LSHTM trackers of COVID-19 candidate vaccines, peer reviewed publications, and press releases were searched until March 31 st , 2021.

Study Selection

All RCTs reporting efficacy outcomes from Phase 3 trials till March 31 st , 2021 were included. Of the 11 vaccine candidates that had started their Phase 3 trials by November 1, 2020. Phase 3 efficacy outcomes were available for 8 vaccine candidates. (PROSPERO CRD42021243121).

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Both authors independently extracted the data required from identified sources, using PRISMA guidelines. The analysis included all RCTs reported in peer reviewed publications and publicly available sources. A random effects model with restricted maximum likelihood estimator was used to summarize the treatment effects. Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used to assess risk of bias. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool.

Main Outcomes and Measures

SARS-CoV-2 infections per protocol in vaccine and placebo groups, risk ratio, prevalence of the COVID-19 infection rate in the populations where the Phase 3 trials were conducted.

Results

8 vaccine candidates had reported efficacy data from a total of 20 independent Phase 3 trials, representing a total of 221,968 subjects, 453 infections across the vaccinated groups and 1,554 infections across the placebo groups. The overall estimate of the risk-ratio is 0.24 (95% CI, 0.17-0.34, p < 0.01), with an I 2 statistic of 88.73%. The meta-regression analysis with pandemic prevalence as the moderator explains almost half the variance in risk ratios across trials (R 2 =49.06%, p<0.01).

Conclusion and Relevance

Pandemic prevalence explains almost half of the between-trial variance in reported efficacies. Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates declines as the pandemic prevalence increases.

Key Points

Question

Does the prevalence of the COVID-19 pandemic explain the heterogeneity in efficacies reported across Phase 3 trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates?

Findings

Almost 50% of the variance in efficacies reported across Phase 3 trials can be explained by differences in COVID-19 infection rate prevailing across trials. Efficacy of evaluated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates falls significantly with increasing prevalence of the COVID-19 pandemic across trial sites.

Meaning

Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates needs to be interpreted in conjunction with the prevalence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Adjustment for location-level prevalence analysis would provide better insights into the efficacy results of Phase 3 trials.

Related articles

Related articles are currently not available for this article.