Overcoming COVID-19 vaccine preferential bias in Europe: Is the end of the pandemic still foreseeable?

The availability of safe and effective vaccine alone does not save lives; it is the inoculation plus other public health measures that do. Recent reports suggest the growing trend in vaccine preferential bias in parts of the world but not much in Europe. The present paper aims to investigate the occurrence of COVID-19 vaccine preferential bias in Europe for effective vaccination planning and pandemic control.

Method

Data on vaccine delivered and vaccination campaigns of the EU member states was collected from Eu center for disease control (EUCDC) on COVID-19 vaccination radar. The data was processed for analysis on MS excel and both descriptive and statistical analysis was done with IBM’s SPSS version 21. Analysis was performed at 95% confidence interval and statistically significant difference was considered at p < 0.05.

Results

We observed statistically significantly lower vaccine uptake compared to the vaccine delivered doses in the present study (average at 62.678 +/-3.928%) (p< 0.05, CI = 95%). Great variances in uptake for Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines (50.927 +/-4.626 %) compared to Pfizer-Biontech vaccine (86.285 +/- 2.1052 %) was observed compared to previous prospective study on the wiliness to receive COVID-19 vaccine in the region (75%).

Conclusion

Public health practitioners and policy makers need to factor the existence of COVID-19 preferential bias based on vaccine type or manufacturer. This will enable them introduce policies including public educational campaigns to overcome biasness on the wiliness to inoculate thereby enhancing vaccine uptake for smooth and effective control of the pandemic.