Accuracy and Glycemic Efficacy of Continuous Glucose Monitors in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: a Retrospective Study
Abstract
Background
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) is approved for insulin dosing decisions in the ambulatory setting, but not currently for inpatients. CGM has the capacity to reduce patient-provider contact in inpatients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), thus potentially reducing in hospital virus transmission. However, there are sparse data on the accuracy and efficacy of CGM to titrate insulin doses in inpatients.
Methods
Under an emergency use protocol, CGM (Dexcom G6) was used alongside standard point-of-care (POC) glucose measurements in patients critically ill from complications of COVID-19 requiring intravenous (IV) insulin. Glycemic control during IV insulin therapy was retrospectively assessed comparing periods with and without adjunctive CGM use. Accuracy metrics were computed and Clarke Error Grid analysis performed comparing CGM glucose values with POC measurements.
Results
24 critically ill patients who met criteria for emergency use of CGM resulted in 47333 CGM and 5677 POC glucose values. During IV insulin therapy, individuals’ glycemic control improved when CGM was used (mean difference -30.2 mg/dL). Among 2194 matched CGM:POC glucose pairs a high degree of concordance was observed with a MARD of 14.8% and 99.5% of CGM:POC pairs falling in Zones A and B of the Clarke Error Grid.
Conclusions
CGM use in critically ill COVID-19 patients improved glycemic control during IV insulin therapy. CGM glucose data were highly concordant with POC glucose during IV insulin therapy in critically ill patients suggesting that CGM could substitute for POC measurements in inpatients thus reducing patient-provider contact and mitigating infection transmission.
Related articles
Related articles are currently not available for this article.