Delineating markers of disease-disease interaction: a systematic methodology and its application to multiple diabetes-helminth cohorts

This article has 1 evaluations Published on
Read the full article Related papers
This article on Sciety

Abstract

Understanding how the molecules in our body respond to the co-occurrence of two diseases in an individual (comorbidity) could lead to mechanistic insights into novel treatments for comorbid conditions. Studies have shown for instance that responses of our immune system to comorbid conditions could be more complex than the union of immune responses to each disease occurring separately, but a data-driven quantification of this complexity is lacking. In this study, we present a systematic methodology to quantify the interaction effect of two diseases on marker variables of interest (using a chronic inflammatory disease diabetes and parasitic infection helminth as illustrative disease pairs to identify cytokines or other immune markers that respond distinctively under a comorbid condition). To perform this systematic comorbidity analysis, we (i) collected and preprocessed data measurements from multiple single- and double-disease cohorts, (ii) extended differential expression analysis of such data to identify disease-disease interaction (DDI) markers (such as cytokines that respond antagonistically or synergistically to the double-disease condition relative to single-disease states), and (iii) interpreted the resulting DDI markers in the context of prior cytokine/immune-cell knowledgebases. We applied this three-step DDI methodology to multiple cohorts of helminth and diabetes (specifically, helminth-infected and helminth treated individuals in diabetic and non-diabetic conditions, and non-disease control individuals), and identified cytokines such as IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and IL-2 to be DDI markers acting at the interface of both diseases in data collected prior to helminth treatment. Validating our expectations, for these cytokines and other T helper Th-2 cytokines like IL-13 and IL-4, their DDI statuses were lost after treatment for helminth infection. For instance, the relative contribution of the DDI term in explaining the individual-to-individual variation of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha cytokines were 67.68% and 48.88% respectively before anthelmintics treatment and dropped to 6.09% and 14.56% respectively after treatment. Furthermore, signaling pathways like IL-10 and IL-4/IL-13 were found to be significantly enriched for genes targeted by certain DDI markers, thereby suggesting mechanistic hypotheses on how these DDI markers influence both diseases. Our results quantified the extent of helminth-diabetes DDI exhibited by various tested cytokine markers, and thereby delineated their role in the pathogenesis of both diseases. These results are promising and encourage the application of our DDI methodology (https://github.com/BIRDSgroup/DDI) to dissect the interaction between any two diseases, provided multi-cohort measurements of markers are available.

Related articles

Related articles are currently not available for this article.