Mitigating the impact of motor impairment on self-administered digital tests in patients with neurological disorders

This article has 0 evaluations Published on
Read the full article Related papers
This article on Sciety

Abstract

Introduction

Cognitive impairments are prevalent in many neurological disorders and remain underdiagnosed and poorly studied longitudinally. Unsupervised remote cognitive testing is an accessible, scalable, and cost-effective solution, however it often fails to separate cognitive deficits from commonly co-occurring motor impairments. To address this gap, we present a computational framework that isolates cognitive ability from motor impairment in self-administered digital tasks.

Methods

Stroke was chosen as a representative neurological disorder, as patients frequently experience both motor and cognitive impairments. Our validation analyses spanned 18 computerised tasks completed by 171 patients longitudinally, covering a broad spectrum of cognitive and motor domains. The computational model was applied on trial-level data to disentangle the contribution of motor and cognitive processes.

Results

In patients with motor hand impairment, standard accuracy performance metrics were confounded in 6 tasks (p<.05, FDR-corrected). In contrast, the Modelled Cognitive metrics obtained from the computational framework showed no significant effects of impaired hand (p>.05, FDR-corrected). Moreover, the Modelled Cognitive metrics correlated more strongly with clinical pen-and-paper scales (mean R2=0.64 vs. 0.43) and functional outcomes (mean R2=0.16 vs 0.09). Brain-behaviour associations were stronger when using the Modelled Cognitive metrics, and revealed intuitive multivariate relationships with individual tasks.

Interpretation

We present converging evidence for the improved clinical utility and validity of the Modelled Cognitive metrics within neurological conditions characterised by co-occurring motor and cognitive deficits. Addressing the confounding effect of motor impairments improves the reliability and biological validity of self-administered digital assessments, enhances accessibility, and supports early detection and intervention across neurological disorders.

Funding

This research is funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/T001402/1).

Related articles

Related articles are currently not available for this article.