Polygenic Background and Penetrance of Pathogenic Variants in Hypertrophic and Dilated Cardiomyopathies

This article has 0 evaluations Published on
Read the full article Related papers
This article on Sciety

Abstract

Importance

Polygenic background modifies variant penetrance in hypertrophic (HCM) and dilated (DCM) cardiomyopathy, diseases with opposing morphologic characteristics and inversely related genetic pathways. Whether polygenic susceptibility for one disease protects against monogenic risk for the other remains unexplored.

Objective

To characterize if polygenic background bidirectionally modifies pathogenicity of established rare variants associated with HCM and DCM.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

The Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB).

Participants

Volunteers enrolled in PMBB with available electronic health record and genotyping data.

Exposures

Normalized polygenic scores (PGS) for HCM and DCM, as well as carrier status of pathogenic variants in established HCM or DCM genes.

Main Outcomes

HCM and DCM defined using electronic health record diagnosis and procedure code, as well as echocardiogram measurements derived from medical records.

Results

This study included 49,434 PMBB participants. An increased HCM PGS was associated with significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), decreased left ventricular internal diameter at end-diastole (LVIDd), and increased interventricular septal thickness (IVS) (p<0.001). An increased DCM PGS was significantly (p<0.001) associated with decreased LVEF and increased LVIDd, but was not associated with IVS. A one standard deviation increase in HCM PGS was associated with increased risk of HCM (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.6-2.0; p=9.6x10-25) and decreased risk of DCM (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.64-0.74; p=4.3x10-22). A one standard deviation increase in DCM PGS was associated with an increased risk of DCM (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.5-1.7; p=1.7x10-40) and decreased risk of HCM (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.63-0.76; p=3.0x10-13). Monogenic and polygenic risk terms had significant, independent effects when combined in models of disease status and echocardiographic measurements; the additional inclusion of either an HCM or DCM PGS improved the discrimination of models of HCM and DCM that included age, sex, and monogenic variant status (>95% probability of difference in AUROC).

Conclusions and Relevance

HCM and DCM risk are markedly modified by polygenic background which exists on an overlapping spectrum. Consideration of polygenic background may offer clinical value through improving understanding and prediction of these inherited cardiomyopathies.

Key Points

Question

How is risk for hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy modified by polygenic background?

Findings

Polygenic scores for HCM and DCM associate with clinical and echocardiographic measures relevant to both diseases and inversely modify the penetrance of pathogenic variants.

Meaning

Polygenic background contributes to HCM and DCM susceptibility, and exists on an overlapping spectrum.

Related articles

Related articles are currently not available for this article.