Protein Language Model Decoys for Target Decoy Competition in Proteomics: Quality Assessment and Benchmarks

Large-scale proteomics relies heavily on target–decoy competition for false discovery rate estimation in peptide identification, and the performance of this strategy depends strongly on the design of the decoy database. Classical generators such as reversal and shuffling remain widely used. Here, we introduce protein language model-based (PLM) decoy generation for peptide identification and benchmark it against classical strategies. We evaluate these approaches using three complementary quality-control layers: sequence-based separability, search-engine-agnostic spectral-space diagnostics, and end-to-end mass spectrometry benchmarks, including pipelines with rescoring. Across these analyses, PLM-based decoys are harder for sequence-only neural networks to distinguish than most classical generators, suggesting fewer obvious sequence-level artifacts. However, this signal is only weakly informative for search performance. Spectral diagnostics further show that short peptides occupy a particularly crowded target–decoy space and are therefore especially prone to local collisions across all generators. In full search pipelines, reverse decoys remain a strong baseline, and current PLM-based generators do not yet provide a clear overall advantage. We therefore view PLM-based decoys not as universal replacements for reverse decoys, but as tunable tools for benchmarking, diagnostics, stress testing, and future adaptive decoy optimization, with increasing value as search models become more expressive.